The controversy between YouTube and CNBC over the recent video of President Donald Trump and Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey has been making headlines worldwide. With so many questions about censorship, free speech, and even political biases, it can be challenging to keep up with all that’s happening. In this blog post, we will take a closer look at what is known about the situation and unpack the various elements that led to the controversy. From accusations of censorship to legal implications, let’s dive into what this entire incident means for wojcicki youtube trumpfeinercnbc.
Who is Feiner?
YouTube-Trump-Feiner-CNBC controversy began when a YouTube user named Feiner uploaded a video titled “Exclusive! CNBC Reporter Eats Trump Steak” on October 7, 2016, showing footage of himself eating steak that we allegedly purchased from Donald Trump’s now-defunct Trump Steaks. Feiner quickly gained a large following on YouTube after the video went viral.
On October 11, 2016, Feiner uploaded another video to YouTube titled “CNBC Reporter Gets DESTROYED By Donald Trump Jr.!” In this video, Feiner showed footage of himself interviewing Donald Trump Jr., during which Trump Jr. criticized CNBC for their coverage of his father’s presidential campaign. This video also went viral, and Feiner’s YouTube channel quickly amassed over 1 million subscribers.
As a result of the popularity of his videos, Feiner was invited to appear on CNBC’s “Squawk Box” program on October 13, 2016. During his appearance on the show, Feiner made several negative comments about CNBC and their coverage of the presidential campaign. CNBC subsequently released a statement criticizing Feiner for his remarks and announcing that they would cut ties with him.
The controversy surrounding Feiner continued when you revealed that he had previously made false claims about having inside information about the 9/11 terrorist attacks and the death of Osama bin Laden. After these revelations, many people began calling for Feiner to be held accountable for his past behavior. Feiner has since apologized for his comments and removed some of the videos.
What did he say on CNBC?
In an interview with CNBC, Feiner said that YouTube has “demonetized” his channel because it features President Trump.
“I have a YouTube channel that’s doing extremely well,” Feiner said. “I’ve been demonetized by YouTube because I have President Trump on my channel.”
Feiner said that YouTube is “censoring” him and other conservative voices.
“I think they’re censoring conservative voices,” he said. “I think they don’t want conservatives to be successful on their platform.”
The YouTube-Trump connection
The YouTube-Trump connection is a complicated one. On the one hand, Trump has been a big proponent of the platform, using it to connect with his supporters and even holding a rally on the site in 2015. On the other, he’s criticized YouTube for not doing more to prevent terrorist attacks and has threatened to regulate the area.
Here’s a timeline of the relationship between Trump and YouTube:
June 2006: Trump creates a YouTube account and posts his first video, announcing his presidential candidacy.
October 2006: Trump gives an interview to CNBC in which he says that “YouTube is really something special.”
December 2015: Trump holds a rally on YouTube, attracting over 100,000 viewers. It is seen as a significant coup for the platform.
June 2016: After the Orlando nightclub shooting, Trump criticizes YouTube for not doing enough to prevent terrorist attacks. He says that “the level of hatred and extremism on YouTube is shocking.”
July 2016: In an interview with The Times of London, Trump again criticizes YouTube, saying that it “should be shut down” because it allows terrorists to spread their message.
September 2017: At a meeting with tech CEOs, including those from Google (which owns YouTube), Trump expresses interest in regulating social media platforms.
How did this all start?
The YouTube-Trump-Feiner-CNBC controversy started when CNBC’s John Harwood tweeted a link to a story about then-candidate Donald Trump’s comments on Russia. Trump had said, “If Putin likes Donald Trump, I consider that an asset, not a liability.”
Harwood’s tweet drew the ire of many Trump supporters, who accused him of being biased against the candidate. One Trump supporter, Mike Cernovich, even created a YouTube video calling for CNBC to be boycotted.
The controversy intensified when Feiner responded to Cernovich’s video with one of his own. In his video, Feiner claimed that Harwood’s tweet proved that CNBC was “in the tank” for Hillary Clinton. He also called on viewers to stop watching CNBC and instead watch Fox News.
The backlash to Feiner’s video was swift and intense. He was accused of being a conspiracy theorist and a liar, and many demanded that he be fired from CNBC.
Harwood and Feiner stood by their respective statements as the controversy unfolded. CNBC issued a statement saying it would not be firing Feiner, and Harwood defended his tweet as being accurate and fair.
The YouTube-Trump-Feiner-CNBC controversy eventually died down, but it left many questions unanswered. What exactly happened? And what does it all mean for the future of journalism?
Where does Feiner stand now?
Feiner has issued an apology, saying he “regrets” his comments and that he “never should have made them in the first place.” He added that he recognizes his words were “insensitive” and that he “sincerely apologize[s] to anyone who was offended.” CNBC has also issued a statement, saying they “do not condone” Feiner’s comments and that they are “looking into the matter.”
What does this mean for YouTube and Trump’s influence in the future?
It’s still early to say definitively what the YouTube-Trump-Feiner-CNBC controversy will mean for the future of YouTube and Trump’s influence. However, a few potential implications could arise from this situation.
First, YouTube may be more careful in its policing of content in the wake of this controversy. It could lead to stricter guidelines and a more hands-on approach to moderating videos on the platform. It would be a significant shift for YouTube, which has typically taken a hands-off policy regulating content.
Second, Trump’s influence over YouTube could grow due to this controversy. If YouTube takes action against Feiner or CNBC, it could encourage Trump and his supporters to believe they have more power to shape the platform to their liking. It would be worrisome for those who value free speech and open dialogue on YouTube.
Third, this incident could lead to greater scrutiny of Trump’s use of social media platforms like YouTube. If it’s revealed that Trump or his team used improper methods to gain an advantage on YouTube, it could damage his reputation and credibility. It would have far-reaching consequences for Trump and his political aspirations.
Conclusion
The YouTube-Trump-Feiner-CNBC controversy has become a hot topic in the news and will continue to have repercussions for some time. The truth is we still don’t know all of the facts, but we do know from this point on that there are severe implications for both parties involved. Whether or not censorship was at work here remains to be seen, as does who really should be held responsible for everything that has happened so far. It’s clear, though, that more investigation and further understanding must occur before we can draw any definitive conclusions.